RSS Feed for This PostThe Article You're Reading Right Now

Miserably obvious movie marketing: the Ghosts of Girlfriends Past trailer.

Blogging’s been in the backseat lately, because life has taken a turn for the hectic and my priorities have had to shift a bit for the immediate future.

But still. When I come across such a pathetically predictable and awful trailer such as that for Ghosts of Girlfriends Past starring Matthew McConaughey and Jennifer Garner, it’s truly impossible for me to sit still about it. I’m only human.

Trailers like this one are why people started making mash-up trailers in the first place. Because every cliched convention, every predictable moment, every cringe-worthy story beat and ham-handed music cue is on full, proud display here, unironic and unselfconscious. Trailers like this don’t know any better, don’t understand how cookie-cutter they are. They simply exist on a plane of mundanity, hoping to ensnare lowbrow moviegoer dollars as quickly as possible, desperate in the hopes that no one will be wise to their old, tired tricks.

Trailers like this also exist because they get made for movies written with as little imagination and creativity as possible, by screenwriters who barely register a pulse as human beings having experienced life outside of Hollywood screenplays.

Let’s take a walk through the screengrabs. Click ‘em to see the full-on horrible:

mccona-doucheRight off the bat, the trailer wants us to know that McConaughey’s character is “a success”. So it tells us, “He is a success”. Also, an Asian assistant (because he’s a success, and also cool) tells him that “Versace is on line one.” This lets us know that he’s a success. And then he breaks up with three women via computer-based conference call, which lets us know that he’s a success. And a douchebag.

mccona-clicheAnd because he’s a movie jerk-face, Jennifer Garner tells him so:

JENNIFER GARNER

If you do anything to detract from her wedding, I will sneak into your room in the middle of the night and cut off your favorite appendage.

She says this because 1) it so cleverly sets up McConaughey’s brilliant response (“Well, that first part sounds nice”), and 2) because it’s something that no one outside of a Hollywood movie would ever, ever say in ten lifetimes. Then the trailer tells us that McConaughey “needs help” (see above re: douchebag), and then introduces Michael Douglas offering the help that the trailer was just kind enough to let us know was coming. Douglas says:

MICHAEL DOUGLAS

I’m here to warn you, kid. Tonight you’re going to be visited by three ghosts.

Seriously? So this movie sets out to blatantly rip off A Christmas Carol without even setting it at Christmas time and calling McConaughey’s character something like “Haden Scrooge” or “Evander Slooge”? And Dickens doesn’t even get “story by” credit?

mccona-whoaHere we see McConaughey experience the effects of a movie ghost passing through him, and he’s seemingly flabbergasted by this, even though all of us have seen movie ghosts do this about 742 times before. He even prefaces the event with the stock, “But wait – you’re dead! bit, just in case the ghost-passing-through trick somehow confuses and mystifies us.

mccona-studNow McConaughey comes across the first ghost in his bed, and he stabs her through the stomach with maybe a fireplace poker, because that’s what you’d do if you found a woman where she didn’t belong and you thought that maybe she was a ghost but you weren’t sure, so why not go ahead and stab her one. She shows McConaughey through a room full of his past girlfriends – which I guarantee you sounded really amazing when the writer pitched this awful story – and one of the girls, wearing a towel, reminds McConaughey that they dated “for 48 seconds”.

What does that even mean? Is that funny? How could even the biggest stud alive accomplish this? She’s wearing a towel, so are we supposed to assume that he stumbled into a ladies’ locker room, turned on the charm, seduced and made love to her all within 48 seconds? In what possible world does this make sense outside of Penthouse Forum?

mccona-lovey-doveyThis may be my favorite part. Here’s where we learn that McConaughey and Garner actually love each other. We learn this because the soft music begins, and then the ghost tells us:

GHOST OF GIRLFRIENDS PAST

This is the moment you truly fell in love with Jenny. You completely let her in. So you did what you do best. You left.

Now why would any screenwriter working today feel the need to conjure up clever exposition or scenes of compelling, character-revealing drama when you can get paid a boatload of money by simply saying it all out in the open like that and then accompany it with images of that exact thing happening? (including romance-charged Foosball playing!)

mccona-dullHere are some random movie cliches, from left to right:
1) idiotically long hair = the past, 2) movie ghosts = always turn on and off the weather, 3) hey, here’s that ghost-passing-through bit again, even more wacky and inspired this time!

I should mention that at this point the trailer voiceover guy REALLY starts to drive it home:

VOICEOVER

What if you could relive your past?

SHOTS of McConaughey and Garner reliving the past.

VOICEOVER

What if you could listen in on the present?

SHOTS of McConaughey listening in to Garner in the present.

VOICEOVER

What if you could change the future?

SHOTS of McConaughey trying to change Garner’s future.

mccona-kidAs children, McConaughey was in love with Garner and took her picture. He tells her that he’ll “keep it forever”. I wonder if this will be important later in the story…

mccona-dopeHere’s the obligatory bit at the end of the movie where McConaughey wreaks mayhem trying to get to Garner. She’s probably left for the airport, he’s realized what a jerk he’s been, and he’s doing untold damage (untold because no one in the story will mention it afterwards) trying to get her back.

I know this because I wrote the exact sequence about 12 years ago. It wasn’t terribly clever then, either.

mccona-predictableHOLY CRAP HE KEPT THAT PICTURE. And Garner’s amazed by this! She’s thrilled and giddy and she’s falling in love all over again! Don’t the people in these movies ever see these movies?

Trackback URL

RSS Feed for This Post11 Comments so far

  1. Ray | Feb 1, 2009 | Reply

    In a blog full of brilliance, this is the peak of achievement. It cannot be done better than this.

    As for McConaughey, I’m so glad he plays on the beach every single day, holding out for only the worthiest projects to grace with his incredible screen presence. In other words, I’ve hated him in everything he’s ever done except his cameo in TROPIC THUNDER.

    His tired Mimbo act can go to hell.

  2. Ray | Feb 1, 2009 | Reply

    I must say … for someone without a lot of time, you sure did a lot of work here, Alan. Perhaps if you just did a few semi-brilliant posts a week, rather than saving it all up for one masterpiece, we’d all be happier.

  3. Vincent | Feb 1, 2009 | Reply

    VOICEOVER

    What if we could ship this script back 70 years? Would Cary Grant or Carole Lombard laugh in your face upon reading it (with Carole adding some of her inventive invective to say how she really feels)? Would Ben Hecht, Norman Krasna or Billy Wilder have the cojones to punch it up? And if they did, and you brought the revised script back to today, would one of the IVy League-trained execs at the studio claim it wasn’t salable in its new form?

  4. Bob Turnbull | Feb 2, 2009 | Reply

    I have to say that he does have some talent though – “Frailty” and “Dazed And Confused” showed that (along with “Contact” and “13 Conversations About One Thing” to a lesser extent). But yeah, it’s getting kinda silly now isn’t it?

  5. MC | Feb 5, 2009 | Reply

    I am taking this post as a what not to do in terms of comedic screenwriting.

  6. Burbanked | Feb 5, 2009 | Reply

    @MC: no no no – by all means do it. Clearly there’s a market in Hollywood for this, and I’m thinking that the writer was well-compensated. Just because it sucks doesn’t mean you can’t sell it.

5 Trackback(s)

  1. From Righteous Fury : Sammyray On Film! | Feb 1, 2009
  2. From Forewarned :: Hollywood Elsewhere | Feb 1, 2009
  3. From matthew mcconaughey - Zuula Blog Search | Feb 2, 2009
  4. From All I Need Is Everything: A Blog Is Born! | Feb 2, 2009
  5. From The Morning Read (2.02.09) on Hitfix | Feb 2, 2009

RSS Feed for This PostPost a Comment